DHSC / MHCLG / local authorities
Social Care
England (devolved nations have their own settlements)
£66.3bn
Year-end spend against cover of £62.8bn
- YTD outturn
- £26.7bn
- Variance
- +£3.5bn
- Run-rate
- 106% of profile
Unofficial working ledger · Chancellor’s desk
Social Care and Defence · FY 2026–27 · as at 10 September 2026
Unofficial
Not an HM Treasury service
Morning brief · 10 September 2026
Act nowChancellor, as at 10 September 2026 the two envelopes you asked to watch are diverging. Social Care is forecast at £66.3bn against cover of £62.8bn (+£3.5bn). Defence is forecast at £72.2bn against £74.0bn (−£1.8bn), 2.50% of GDP. Top up social care now. Children’s placements will not wait until the Spring. An in-year minute is cheaper than waiting for the Spring.
Social care is projected +£3.5bn against cover of £62.8bn, driven by children’s placements and long-term adult packages. Defence is £100m short of the 2.5% NATO core floor on this path. £1.8bn from Defence to Social Care; £1.7bn from the Reserve to Social Care; £100m from the Reserve to Defence. This keeps statutory care duties and the NATO floor inside the Chancellor’s current envelope.
DHSC / MHCLG / local authorities
England (devolved nations have their own settlements)
£66.3bn
Year-end spend against cover of £62.8bn
Ministry of Defence
United Kingdom
£72.2bn
Year-end spend against cover of £74.0bn
NATO core floor — 2.50% of GDP
Forecast defence outturn is £72.2bn (2.50% of GDP). Floor is £72.3bn.
NATO broad path — 2.70% with intelligence
Defence plus the Single Intelligence Account (£5.1bn) is 2.67% of GDP.
Care Act & children’s statutory duties
Forecast £66.3bn funds the statutory floor. Overspend risk is +£3.5bn.
Chancellor’s special reserve
£6.4bn remains of £6.4bn set aside at the Budget for these two envelopes.
Children’s placements — in-year control
Social care run-rate is 106% of the seasonal profile. Placements are the principal driver.
+£1.7bn
Floor £72.3bn
of £6.4bn
Second opinion
WTO tests: the NATO core floor is already met this year; care is already overspent; a 3.5% path is a decade of industry, not a cut to children’s placements. Open the Geneva note and pull the raid slider.
Law Officers
Cross-Estimate virement, Care Act duties, the Children Act, the equality duty and HRA s.6 all fail if you take a percentage off care in-year. NATO is not a statute. Open the legal desk before you post a minute.